LECTURES IN GUN
SAFETY
SUBJECTS
|
TIME
|
MODE OF INSTRUCTION
|
1. Basic
firearms laws, rules and regulations
|
30 minutes
|
Lecture
|
2. Basic
firearms safety procedures
|
30 minutes
|
Lecture
|
3. Basic
marksmanship
|
1 hour
|
Lecture
|
4.
Basic shooting examination
grouping of shots
at a distance of at least 7 meters
|
6 hours
|
Practical Exercise
|
TOTAL
|
8 hours
|
1.
Basic
Firearms Laws, Rules & Regulations
Legal Aspects:
1.1. Inherent
in crimes of force or threatened forces is the concept of justifiable force
i.e. the use of force for some purpose approved by law. For asset protection,
protection of professionals and private security personnel, this will be
crucial, because circumstances will exist in which the use of force against
persons may exist and be required. What kind and how much force to use may have
to be decided on the spot at the crucial moment. A general awareness of lawful
and/or legal limit to the use of force is therefore essential.
1.2. Article II
of the Revised Penal Code provides an exhaustive treatment of reasonable force
under certain justifying circumstances and provides in substance, that the
following do not incur criminal liability:
1.2.1.
Anyone who acts in defense of his person or
rights, provided that the following circumstances occur:
Unlawful aggression
Necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending
himself
1.2.2.
Anyone who acts in defense of the person or
rights of a relative, provided that the
1st and 2nd
requisite in the preceding paragraph are present, in case the
provocation was given by the person attacked, that the one making the defense
had no part therein.
1.2.3.
Anyone who acts in defense of the person or
rights of a stranger, provided that the 1st and 2nd
requisites of paragraph 1.2.1. are present and the person defending is not
induced by revenge, resentment or other evil motive.
The three (3) concepts of defense
1. Self-defense
2. Defense
of relatives
3. Defense
of strangers
SELF-DEFENSE covers not only the defense of the person or
body of the one assaulted but also that of his rights, that is, those rights
the enjoyment of which is provided by law. Penal laws make self-defense lawful
because it is impossible for the state in all cases to prevent aggression upon
its citizens and offer protection to the person unjustly attacked. Likewise, it
cannot be conceived that a person should succumb to an unlawful aggression
without offering any resistance.
The first element of self-defense is unlawful aggression.
There can be no self-defense without unlawful aggression for then there is
nothing to prevent or repel. There is unlawful aggression when the peril to
one’s life, limb or right is either actual or eminent. Unlawful must be
emphasize, for there is what we call lawful aggression – like the fulfillment
of a duty or the exercise of a right in a more or less violent manner is an
aggression, but is lawful.
Retaliation is not self-defense. In retaliation, the
aggression that was begun by the injured party already ceased to exist when the
accused attacked him. In self-defense, the aggression still existed when the
aggressor was injured or disabled by the person making a defense. Hence, when
the aggressor flees, unlawful aggression no longer exists and the one making a
defense has no more right to kill or even to wound the former aggressor. There
is no unlawful aggression when there is an agreement to fight as each of the protagonists is at
once assailant and assaulted and neither can invoke self-defense, because
aggression, which is an incident in the fight, is bound to arise from one or
the other combatant. If there was an agreement to fight, and the aggression was
ahead of the stipulated time and place, it is unlawful and the assaulted can
claim self-defense if in repelling the aggression he killed the aggressor.
The second element is reasonable necessity of the means
employed to prevent or repel the aggression. The reasonableness of the means
employed will depend upon:
- The nature and quality of the weapons. The use of a revolver against an aggressor armed with a bolo is held reasonable, if appearing that the deceased was advancing upon the accused and within a few feet of striking distance when the latter shot him. All other things being equal, a person attacked with fist blows must repel the same with fist blows also.
- Physical condition, character and size. The aggressor was a “bull”, a man larger and stronger of known violent character, with previous criminal records of assault. He attacked with fist blows a smaller man, who as a warning, cut him with a bolo on the left shoulder. The aggressor attempted to possess himself of the bolo. Killing him with a bolo was justified.
- Other circumstances considered. In view of the eminence of danger, a shotgun is reasonable means to prevent aggression with a bolo.
GENERAL RULES (Excerpts from Rules of Engagement dated 26
June 1997 Directive from the Chief, PNP)
- Under all circumstances, the use of force, including firearms, is justifiable only by virtue of the Doctrine of Self-Defense, Defense of Relative and Defense of Stranger. As stated by the Supreme Court, nobody, including the police and even the military, is above the law.
- The authority to carry firearms is for the conduct of official duties.
- Do not use weapons and ammunitions not specifically authorized.
- Do not carry personally owned firearms or other personally owned weapons while on duty.
- Do not use specific weapon without completing designated training and qualification for that make, model or type of weapon.
USE OF FORCE
The primary consideration in any use of force is the timely and
effective application of the appropriate/justifiable level of force required to
establish and maintain lawful control. A paramount consideration is the
preservation of life and prevention of bodily injury.
- Use of Deadly Force
1. Deadly
force is the use of any force that is likely to carry death or serious physical
injury.
2. Deadly
force does not include force that is not likely to cause death or serious
physical injury but unexpectedly results in such death or injury.
3. Security
Officer/Guard use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the Security
Officer/Guard has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force posses an
imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the Security
Officer/Guard or to another person.
4. If
force other than deadly force reasonably appears to be sufficient to accomplish
an arrest or otherwise accomplish the security/law enforcement purpose, deadly
force is not necessary.
- Use of verbal warnings prior to use of deadly force
If feasible and if to do so would
not increase the danger to the Security Officer/Guard or others, a verbal warning to submit to the authority of
the security officer/guard shall be given prior to the use of deadly force.
- Use of Warning Shots are not permitted.
- Use of deadly force involving moving vehicles
Weapons may be fired at the driver
or other occupants of a moving motor vehicle only when the Security
Officer/Guard has a reasonable belief that the subject posses imminent danger
of death or serious physical injury to the Security Officer/Guard or other person, and the public safety
benefits of using such force outweighs the risks to the safety of the Security
Officer/Guard or other persons.
Use of deadly force against vicious
animals
Deadly force may be directed
against dogs or other vicious animals when necessary in self-defense or defense
of others.
USE OF FORCE RESULTING IN DEATH
INJURY
A. Immediate
Management Response
1. Agency
management immediately dispatches an Inspector/Supervisor to the scene to act
as liaison.
2. A
Supervisor or Agency Investigator should be assigned when practical. The
Special Investigator’s responsibilities are to:
Remove the Security Officer/Guard
from the shooting scene, if necessary.
Assist the Security Officer/Guard
as needed.
If the Security Officer/Guard
discharged a firearm resulting in death or injury, ensure that the firearm and
spent cartridges are placed into evidence. This applies only if the firearm
involved has not been turned-over to local police authorities.
If necessary, ensure that the
involved Security Officer’s/Guard’s family is personally briefed on the
incident.
If the personnel is injured,
provide the family transportation to the site of treatment, refer all inquiries
to the Agency’s Public Relations Officer.
B. Follow-up
Response
1. An
incident report should immediately be provided to the Agency’s main office. A
minimum report should provide the following information:
Date, time and place of the
incident
Description of the Security
Officer/Guard’s activity prior to the firearms discharge, i.e. investigation,
protection, search, arrest, etc.
Reason for using force and
description of the incident
Description of any weapon/s used
Lighting conditions
Distances between any individuals
Injuries caused or received
Property damage
Names of any persons arrested and
list of offenses charged
Description of the weapon/s used
by the offender
Identification of other persons
witnessing or involved in the incident
FIREARMS DISCHARGE NOT RESULTING IN DEATH, INJURY OR SERIOUS
PROPERTY DAMAGE
1. Security
Officer/Guard who discharge firearms not resulting in death, injury or serious
property damage, notify an inspector/Supervisor as soon as possible. This
include unintended discharges, such as during firearms training, qualification,
testing, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment